Contents | (Visit Preferences to set your user name.) | Related To Jury Nullification California | RecentChanges | Preferences | Index | Login | Logout
Search For Books About:
Search The Net:
"Who can make us? There is something called nullification-right?-where a jury disregards the law and does what it thinks is right?"
"of courtroom power among the judge, the lawyers, and the jury will serve both justice and ... tangled under the label "jury nullification," they are distinct and have met different fates."
"a white woman and sentenced to death by an all-white jury. Claiming that jury selection was discriminatory, he appealed the verdict."
See more:
Jury Nullification and California
Subjects > Law > Jury > Jury Nullification
In the conclusion of the majority decision, the California Supreme Court declared: “We reaffirm, therefore, the basic rule that jurors are required to determine the facts and render a verdict in accordance with the court’s instructions on the law. A juror who is unable or unwilling to do so is ‘unable to perform his [or her] duty’ as a juror and may be discharged.”
- California strikes down Jury Nullification - http://www.libertysearch.com/articles/2001/000063.html
- The California Supreme Court recently ruled that jury nullification was "contrary to our ideal of equal justice for all" and agreed that judges could remove jurors who resorted to nullification. The principal behind jury nullification is that jurors are allowed to vote their consciences -- they can vote to acquit a defendant if they think the law he or she is charged with is unjust.
- High court throws out conscience . Matt Sebastian, Contra Costa Times, May 8, 2001.
- http://www.americanfreepress.net/Police_State/California_Court_Undermines_Po/california_court_undermines_po.html
- The court today uses a “juror’s oath” as an artificial device to void the individual rights of jurors. The court’s recent opinion focused almost entirely on the court’s self-proclaimed power to remove jurors who violate their oath to follow the instructions of the judge.
- Jurors are told they must swear an oath that they will only consider whether the facts in a case meet the letter of the law when arriving at their verdict, and strictly adhere to the judge’s instructions when it comes to interpreting the law.
- Those jurors who attempt to exercise their power to refuse to convict under unfair laws in spite of the lies they’ve been told by the judge, can then be intimidated with threats of legal sanctions—not for refusing to convict under unfair laws, but for violating the judge’s instructions not to exercise their powers as jurors.
- The court may claim that a judge now has the power to require jurors to swear an oath of obedience to himself—and punish those he suspects of violating that oath.
- The court assumes it will get away with such obvious revisionist interpretations because citizens have consistently tolerated such infringements. Citizens still possess the right and power to reverse the nation’s decline into tyranny. But the people must first decide that the freedoms are worth the effort to defend them.
Other sites to consider:
- http://www.fija.org - Jurors must know that they have the option and the responsibility to render a verdict based on their conscience and on their sense of justice as well as on the merits of the law.
Check out [Facts About Trees]
Search for books about:
Search The Net:
Bobsgear - Get A Free
Enterrpise Wiki Space!
Review: The Bobsgear Project was
started to develop a variety of Confluence
plugins. This installation of
the Confluence Enterprise wiki includes flexible
attachments, many Confluence plugins, personal blogs,
interesting articles, and more. Bobsgear already has spaces related to
politics, art and
photography wiki,
technical issues wiki,
ediscovery wiki, health,
Christian theology and Sabbath
School wiki, the
bible, book reviews,
and quotations. Bobsgear
allows free signup, and invites anyone to create a
free hosted Confluence wiki space.
NEW
USERS CLICK HERE! for a quick introduction to
Wiki.
Interested in Swanstone?