![[Home]](/wiki.gif)
Chop Shop Swat Team Raid And Litigation PrivilegeChop Shop Swat Team Raid And Litigation Privilege
I'M COUNTING ON FINDING A LAWYER WHO WILL TAKE MY CASE, I DON'T KNOW A BETTER WAY!
I HAD MY HOUSE RAIDED BY SWAT TEAM POLICE THREE TIMES IN TWO AND ONE HALF YEARS, FOR THREE DIFFERENT REASONS. ALL WERE UN-SUCCESSFUL. THE SECOND TIME I FILED FORMAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THE THREE CITIES AND THE THREE POLICE DEPARTMENTS. I THEN CONTACTED A COUPLE OF LAW OFFICES I WAS REFERRED TO BY FREINDS. I WAS CONTACTED BY BOTH AND ONE OF THE FIRMS WAS VERY INTERESTED AND EMEDIATELY CAME TO MY HOME TO INTERVIEW MY FAMILY AND I. THINGS WENT WELL AND WE MADE AN AGREEMENT BEFORE THEY LEFT OUR HOME. THEY TOOK THE CASE ON CONSIGNMENT AND IT ALL SEEMED VERY PROMISING.
FIVE YEARS WOULD PASS AND THEY WOULD SPEND $80,000. ON THE CASE AND I WOULD WITNESS AND BECOME THE VICTIM OF A STORY MANUFACTURED BY SEVEN LAWYERS HIRED BY THE DEFENSE. TWO OF FROM AT ONE OF THE LARGEST LAW FIRMS IN THE COUNTRY. MY LAWYERS BEING THE ONLY TWO IN THEIR FIRM, WERE CERTAINLY OVERWHELMED AND IN NEED OF HELP.
I WAS RAIDED THE THIRD TIME DURING THIS FIRST FILING AND A SECOND SUIT WAS FILED IN FEDERAL COURT. I'LL KEEP MY OPINION OF MY LAWYERS PERFORMANCE TO MYSELF FOR NOW AND JUST SAY THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY THEY LET THE DEFENSE PUSH SIX OR SEVEN COMPLETELY UNTRUE STATEMENTS ABOUT ME, & MY HOME, WHEN THESE WERE EASILY PROVEN FALSE FROM WITHIN THE SUIT, BY THE EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE DEFENSE'S IN THEIR ANSWER OF THE SUIT, INCLUDING PROPERTY RECEIPTS FOR ITEMS TAKEN BY THE POLICE DURING THE FIRST RAID.
I WAS UPSET AND CONFUSED WHEN READING THESE STATEMENTS THIS PACK OF LIES, I WANTED THEM PROVEN FALSE AND REMOVED, MY LAWYERS DID NOT MAKE THAT HAPPEN, WHY? I BECAME ILL OVER THIS, SERIOUSLY, I HAVE NEVER BEEN THE SAME, THESE ARE WHAT THEY SAID: I WAS SAID TO BE A CONVICTED FELON OVER AND OVER AGAIN. UNTRUE! "I WAS SAID TO HAVE REACHED FOR A PISTOL DURING THE ENTRY BY THE POLICE IN THE FIRST RAID, A LIE TOLD BY THE WRITER OF THE FIRST SEARCH WARRANT, IF TRUE I WOULD BE DEAD". "MY HOUSE AND YARD WERE OVER AND OVER AGAIN SAID TO BE SURROUNDED BY TWLEVE FOOT FENCES ERECTED BY ME AND THIS BEING NORMAL BEHAVIOR OF CHOP SHOPS". IF TRUE THAT WOULD BE 4 FEET ABOVE THE EVES OF MY HOUSE, UNTRUE. "I WAS SAID TO BE A CAREER CRIMINAL WHO JUST HAS NEVER BEEN CAUGHT". UNTRUE! THESE STATEMENTS WOULD BECOME THE MAINSTAY FOR THE DEFENSE AS WELL AS THE BASIS FOR THE DECISION OF SUMMARY JUDGEMENT AGAINST US, AND LATER THE APPELATE JUDGES REFFERED TO THESE SAME STATEMENTS REASONS FOR DENYING OUR APPEALS IN BOTH CASES.
I HAVE ALL THE COURT DOCUMENTS AND ALL THE PROOF IS WITHIN THESE DOCUMENTS. I RECEIVED ALL OF THE PAPER WORK FROM THE CASE WHEN ONE OF MY LAWYERS CAME TO MY HOUSE TO TELL ME THAT WE HAD LOST THE APPEALS AND THEY COULD NO LONGER REPRESENT ME. NO WRITTEN RELEASE JUST DUMPING ALL THE STUFF ON ME, WITH A FEW WORDS LIKE, "WE DID OUR BEST" "WE WISH WE COULD OF DONE MORE" THAT'S ALL SHE WROTE. I DON'T THINK SO.
I NEED SOME HOT LITIGATING LAWYERS TO SUE THE DEFENDANTS LAW FIRMS. IT'S AN OPEN AND SHUT CASE FOR EXPERIENCED LITIGATORS. THEY HAVE NO WHERE AND NOTHING TO HIDE BEHIND, THE WORDS WERE WRITTEN IN STONE BY THE COURT REPORTERS AND BY THEIR OWN PEN. IF ANYONE THINKS THEY WOULD POSSIBLY BE INTERESTED IN LOOKING OVER THE CASE MATERIAL TO ASSERTAIN THE MERITS OF THIS CASE, ALSO NOTE THAT MY LAWYERS HAVE TOLD ME THAT THEY WOULD GLADLY HELP WITH ANYTHING THAT WAS NEEDED IF I DECIDED TO HIRE ANOTHER LAW FIRM. I REALLY DO LIKE THEM AS PEOPLE AND I AM GRATEFUL, AND APPRECIATIVE FOR ALL THEY HAVE GIVEN AND I WOULD NEVER TURN ON THEM, REGARDLESS OF THE OUTCOME.
THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT CASE FOR ALL OF THE GOOD LAWYERS WHO STAY WITHIN THE BOUNDS WHILE TRYING A CASE AND USE CUNNING STRATEGIES TO WIN, NOT THE BOLD FACE LIES USED BY UN-PROFFESIONAL AMATUERS WHOSE BEHAVIOR IS RAPIDLY RUINING THE INTEGRITY OF THE LEGAL PROFFESION AS A WHOLE. IF ANY ONE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR WANTS TO REVIEW THE RECORDS OR OTHER,? PLEASE CONTACT ME THOMAS FRAGALE, BY TEL.-(310)643-0192 E-MAIL: DtngThomas?Create@Aol.com I AM LOCATED IN LOS ANGELES IN THE CITY
Sandra Smith - 03:42pm Jul 25, 2000 (36.1 70/1705)
Thomas
I am certain that your attorneys did not spend $80,000 of their own money to throw your case. Further the other side can put more garbage into the record under the litigation privilege than you can imagine. I have not had the horror of your experience but I was involved in a medical malpractice case against Loma Linda and I am aware of the lies that can be placed into the record without any compunction or hesitation it seems. My suggestion is that you contact Leo Turrell or Steven Yagman. They will take this case if anyone can. I must tell you that in my legal opinion you cannot sue the defense attorneys for reasons based in both substantive and procedural law.
koot - 06:54am Jul 28, 2000 (36.1.1 73/1705)
Sandra your not saying
Sandra: You're not saying that one side's attorney can put down anything on public record about a person if that person's attorney does not challenge what they are trying to put down are you? Because if that's the case how can a person fight back? Koot
Sam Erwin - 01:58pm Jul 29, 2000 (36.1.1.1 75/1705)
Koot
Here is a case note discussing the litigation privilege contained in CA's Civil Code straight out of Westlaw:
"Litigation privilege barring subsequent derivative actions based on statements of witnesses, attorneys or parties during litigation, is intended to encourage parties to feel free to exercise their fundamental right of resort to the courts for assistance in resolution of their disputes, without being chilled from exercising such right by fear that they may subsequently be sued in a derivative tort action arising out of something said or done in the context of the litigation. " Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp. (App. 1 Dist. 1997) 61 Cal.Rptr.2d 518, 53 Cal.App.4th 15, rehearing denied, review denied.
So much do we wish to protect the right of litigants to present their cases with freedom from fear of reprisal that it has been held more than once that the " Litigation privilege is absolute, complete defense, regardless of malice, to defamation and other torts, including intentional interference with economic relations and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Cal.Civ.Code 47(b)(2)."
I do not know what Smith was saying but this is my answer to your question.
|
Interested in Inventor?